Evidence

What is verified, and what is not

Every claim on this site should be checkable. Where it is not, we say so on the same line.

Verifiable today

ProductPublicPrimary source2026 · Confirmed

KidsPiggy Play — live product surface

The interactive KidsPiggy surface, publicly reachable at play.kidspiggy.app.

What it demonstrates
A working, publicly reachable product surface exists.
Limitations
Public reachability is not evidence of educational effectiveness or safety testing.
Source
Live website · last verified 2026-08-04
ProductPublicPrimary source2026 · Confirmed

KidsPiggy Adventure — explanation surface

Longer-form explanation surface at adventure.kidspiggy.app.

What it demonstrates
The project publishes its reasoning and worldview publicly.
Limitations
Self-published project material, not external review.
Source
Live website · last verified 2026-08-04
PublicationPublicPrimary source2026 · Confirmed

PiggyLeaks.Today — digital-safety resource

Adult-facing educational resource on online risk and algorithmic influence affecting children.

What it demonstrates
Ongoing public educational output from the same organization.
Limitations
Self-published; not peer-reviewed.
Source
Live website · last verified 2026-08-04
Development recordPublicPrimary source2026 · Confirmed

Free Intelligence Institute — operating organization

The organization that develops and operates KidsPiggy, with its own public site and evidence pages.

What it demonstrates
A named, contactable operator stands behind the product.
Limitations
Organizational registration details are not published on this site.
Source
Live website · last verified 2026-08-04
PublicationPublicPrimary sourceNo date · Date not confirmed

E²=CM² research notebook knowledge graph

Open research notebook whose public knowledge graph represents KidsPiggy as an applied surface downstream of Kai256.

What it demonstrates
The project documents how KidsPiggy sits inside a wider research architecture.
Limitations
Declared by the project's own research documentation. Experimental and conceptual; not independently verified and not an established scientific result.
Source
e2cm2.org · last verified 2026-08-04

Recorded by the project, not yet publicly verifiable

These records exist internally. Until a source is published, treat them as project statements rather than evidence.

User sessionAvailable on requestPrimary sourceNo date · Date not confirmed

178 documented conversation sessions

An internal archive of 178 documented conversation sessions. Sessions, not unique users.

What it demonstrates
Real interaction volume has been recorded and retained.
Limitations
178 refers to conversation sessions, not 178 unique users. Not an independent study, has no control group, and is not evidence of learning outcomes. Source archive link not yet published.
Source
Project-held archive
TestAvailable on requestPrimary sourceNo date · Date not confirmed

PiggyBot Lab automated tests

An internal testing environment for the KidsPiggy conversational layer.

What it demonstrates
Automated internal testing is part of the development process.
Limitations
Test count and repository URL not confirmed. Internal testing is not independent validation.
Source
Project repository
Development recordRestrictedPrimary sourceNo date · Date not confirmed

OpenAI Build Week submissions

Submissions entered by the project team.

What it demonstrates
Participation in an external build programme.
Limitations
Submitted — pending review. No result has been announced. Submission is not selection, endorsement or validation.
Source
Project statement
Patent applicationRestrictedPrimary sourceNo date · Date not confirmed

Patent application

A patent application associated with the wider technology work.

What it demonstrates
Formal IP filing activity.
Limitations
Patent application pending. Nothing is granted or patented. Application number and jurisdiction not confirmed.
Source
Project statement

What KidsPiggy does not claim

  • No independent third-party audit or certification.
  • No peer-reviewed study or published research on KidsPiggy.
  • No measured learning outcomes or control-group evidence.
  • No award, prize or selection outcome.
  • No granted patent — an application is pending.
  • No endorsement by any school, university, regulator or NGO.

What would strengthen the evidence

  • An independent safety and content review by a third party.
  • A structured classroom pilot with an educator partner.
  • Published, anonymised session data with a documented method.
  • A pre-registered evaluation of a single, narrow learning outcome.

Full record list

The evidence library lets you filter every record by type, access level and evidence level, and gives each one a stable anchor for citation.